Gap widens slightly from mid-1990s
Gini coefficient for equivalised
disposable income, UK
On one commonly used measure of inequality, the
Gini coefficient, the inequality of disposable income
has moved through several distinct phases in the last
two decades.
During the first half of the
1980s disposable income inequality was fairly stable.
The second half of the 1980s was then characterised
by an increase. During the first half of the 1990s
inequality fell slightly, but since then it appears
to have risen slightly. So that in 2001-02, the Gini
coefficient was back to its 1990 level.
Inequality of original income
(before taking account of taxes and benefits) has
followed a different pattern. It rose fairly steadily
throughout the 1980s and has been relatively stable
since then.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies
(IFS) has investigated some of the possible explanations
for the changes in inequality seen over the last two
decades, and in particular why the trends are different
over the economic cycles of the 1980s and 1990s.
Wage growth played a part: inequality
tends to rise during periods of rapid wage growth
because the poorest households are the most likely
to contain non-working individuals.
The economic recovery in the
1980s was characterised by large increases in wages
in each of the years from 1984 to 1988 matching the
period when inequality increased rapidly. In contrast
wage growth was very slow to return in the recovery
of the early to mid-1990s – a time of stable
or falling inequality. Growth in self-employment income
and in unemployment were also found to be associated
with periods of increased inequality.
Demographic factors, such as
the growth in one person households, make a relatively
unimportant contribution compared with labour market
changes.
The IFS have found that changes
in the tax and benefit system have an impact in accordance
with what economic theory would suggest. The income
tax cuts of the 1970s and early 1980s worked to increase
income inequality while direct tax rises in the early
1980s and 1990s - together with the increases in means-tested
benefits in the late 1990s - produced the opposite
effect.